Skip to main content

Working Girl

 


Babygirl opens with Nicole Kidman and husband Antonio Banderas having the kind of passionate, intimate sex you see in Hollywood movies. When they are done, Kidman quickly scampers off to another room to enjoy some pornography. Hollywood sex you see, often doesn't cut it in the real world. And that's really the crux of writer/director Halina Reijn's latest film, even ideal isn't good enough if you aren't being honest with yourself.

Kidman plays Romy Mathis, a tech company CEO with a charming and handsome theatre director husband (Banderas), a seemingly good relationship with her two children and at least two palatial homes. She has accomplished the "have it all" life women are told to aspire to and works hard to keep it, striving to be the best at her job, undertaking a painstaking (and painful looking) beauty routine including such delights as numbing free botox and ice baths and attempts to be the ideal loving and supportive wife. The problem is, she isn't satisfied in the bedroom, longing for something a bit more out there than her gentleman husband is comfortable with (for a creative type he is a bit of a square). Enter tall drink of water Harris Dickinson as young intern Samuel. He first catches her attention in the street when he calmly brings an out of control dog to heel and when they later meet at work it turns out he has an intuition for seeing what people need and quickly spots Romy is desperate for somebody to call the shots over her. She makes half hearted attempts to quell his directness but the pair soon end up in a master/slave style sexual relationship with the fact she is risking both career and family only fuelling Romy's desire. The central affair may have been billed as steamy, erotic thriller fodder, and at times it is, but it also has painfully awkward moments as the pair navigate their situation and find their roles. One scene involving milk will bring back nightmares to UK viewers who remember an infamous episode of Celebrity Big Brother.

The best thing about Babygirl is that it isn't a film that sets out to judge or punish its lead character for having sexual desire. There is a worrying mention early on of Romy having been raised in some sort of cult but the film settles on her desire to get freaky being part of her natural character rather than a character flaw. The moral dilemma is in her actions, not her wants. Embarking on an affair behind your partners back is one thing and the power dynamic between Kidman and Dickinson is interesting (and certainly not something that would have worked were the genders reversed). She is his superior snd supposed mentor but in many ways the power rests with him as he can, as he says, "end her with a phone call". More grey area is added by Dickinson's enigmatic portrayal of Samuel, there is no doubt he is one hundred percent complicate in the relationship, the instigator in fact, but it is mostly unclear how much his child like outbursts are part of a controlling game and how much he is just not emotionally equipped for the situation. 

It feels a bit redundant to say Nicole Kidman is good but she really locks down a challenging role. For a film of this type it's low on nudity but high on emotional vulnerability and she deftly avoids the trap of making Romy a Jekyll and Hyde character with two separate personalities. There is enough fragility in her polished CEO mode that we can see she needs something more and enough steel to let us know that she put herself in her predicament willingly. Both Dickinson and Banderas are also great and there is a low key fantastic performance from Sophie Wilde as Kidman's subtly frustrated assistant, tired of not get her due and her boss's lack of action on improving things for women in the workplace.

The films weaknesses are mostly related to the story telling. It was obviously never going to be a plot heavy film; you know two people are going to meet, embark on an affair and eventually there will be some sort of reckoning. There's no problem with that but a couple of things don't quite ring true. For instance, Romy is taken aback by the way Samuel begins challenging her at work when surely slapping down cocky young men at work is part and parcel of daily working life for women in positions of power. The timeline is also a little confusing, with birthday parties, fallings out and montages it feels like a fair bit of time passes yet the decorated trees suggest the entire film takes place in the run up to Christmas. 

Ultimately, your milage with Babygirl with depend on your ability to get on board with the main character's inner struggle. On the one hand, it's a film about a one percenter who takes advantage of her position of power to cheat on a loving husband rather than just tell him to get a little nasty between the sheets. On the other, its the story of a women who has done everything right but is still not whole because society has told her that being herself is in someway shameful and the damage that can do to a persons life. Or you can just pretend you are watching an after hours Hallmark movie. 

7 pocket cookies out of 10.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Whisky in the Jar

Glenrothan has been sold as "a love letter to Scotland" and given that it features two of Scotland's most accomplished actors, whisky, folk music and stunning landscape shots, it's hard to argue. Is it anything more than that? Not really, but maybe that's OK.  Alan Cumming and Brian Cox (who also directs) are Donal and Sandy Nairn, estranged brothers and heirs to a beloved whisky distillery. Growing up, big brother Sandy was desperate to leave their idyllic village and its distillery behind, while Donal wanted to be nowhere else. Family issues resulted in them both leading the life that the other used to dream of, as Donal left for America and Sandy took over the family business when their father's health began to fail. When his blues bar burns down, Donal makes his first trip back to Scotland in forty years, accompanying his daughter and granddaughter to visit his ailing brother. A quick look at the trailer tells you everything you need to know about Glenroth...

Listening to the Sounds in Silence

The tagline for breakout indie horror hit Undertone is, "The Scariest Movie You'll Ever Hear". This declaration sets out the film's stall as a uniquely audio based horror, and that is exactly what it delivers. The result is something that will chill some people to the bone and leave others falling asleep in their seats.  Originally made for a meagre $500,000, the film takes place entirely in one location (director Ian Tuason's childhood home) and centres on podcaster Ivy, played with impressive range by Nina Kiri. Ivy is caring for her dying mother (the only other person who appears onscreen) so has to wait until the early hours of the morning to record her paranormal podcast with friend Justin (the voice of Adam DiMarco). She plays the role of sceptic to Justin's believer but her rationality is tested when her cohost begins playing some eerie audio files he received from an anonymous listener. Although Undertone isn't a found footage film, it very much t...

Husband and Strife

If the purpose of cinema is to make the audience feel something, then few films succeed as completely as The Drama. The fact that said feeling is one of wanting to curl up and die of awkwardness shouldn't even be taken as a warning. Like a masochist munching down on a giant bowl of ghost peppers, you will likely find every bite delicious.  Robert Pattinson and Zendaya play soon to be married couple Charlie and Emma. They have the picture perfect relationship. They have successful jobs, a beautiful Boston apartment and look like Zendaya and Robert Pattinson. Little differences in their attitudes toward a wedding dance rehearsal and their potentially drug smoking DJ hint they may not be completely on the same page, and when a drunken game leads to Emma disclosing something from her past, their relationship experiences some severe turbulence.  It's tricky to fully discuss The Drama without spoiling Emma's revelation (and it absolutely should not be spoiled), but it points to ...

Fight For Your Right

The debate about the "Great American Novel" (a book that encapsulates the spirit and character of the United States) continues to rage. While One Battle After Another is loosely inspired by a book (Thomas Pynchon's Vineland), it feels like Paul Thomas Anderson's second stab, after "There Will Be Blood", at crafting the Great American Movie. This is a very different beast to his 2007 masterpiece, both in setting and tone, but is just as epic and wide reaching in its own way. Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor) is the leader of militant revolutionary group "The French 75" and her partner Pat Calhoun (Leonardo DiCaprio) is the team explosive expert. The movie opens with the self-styled freedom fighters breaking a bunch of detained immigrants out of a holding camp. This brings them into the crosshairs of Colonel Stephen J. Lockjaw who begins pursuing the group. After being arrested, Perfidia disappears, leaving Pat to raise their baby daughter in hi...

It Sure Does

 Love Hurts is Ke Huy Quan's first ever lead role. After decades out the game and struggling to keep his insurance prior to his Oscar winning turn in "Everything Everywhere, All At Once", you can hardly blame him for taking the chance to front a movie. Unfortunately, in Jonathan Eusabio's directorial debut, he has landed in a misfire. Quan plays Marvin Gable, a cheery real estate agent living his best life as he crushes the sales game and keeps everyone in the office (except for his depressed assistant) happy with his home baking. Unbeknownst to his colleagues he used to be a gangland hitman for his mob boss brother "Knuckles" and when the mysterious Rose, who Marvin was supposed to have killed, remerges, big brother dispatches the goons to get some answers from him. Cue high jinks as Marvin battles henchmen kung fu style while trying to keep his current and past lives from colliding. It's a fun idea but nothing quite comes together in the execution. Th...

Fifty Shades of Chrononberg

 If you've been missing pure  David Chrononberg then Crimes of the Future has you covered. It has the lot; body mutilation, main character undergoing a metamorphosis, questions about what defines being human, integrity of the mind, the collision of different world views and pretty much every other recurring theme of his is present and correct. So needless to say, it isn't for everyone. The film takes place in the (possibly near) future, when most humans have evolved to no longer feel pain and in some cases grow mysterious new organs. Viggo Maortensen and Lea Seydoux play a pair of performance artists whose act revolves around removing Mortensen's excess organs in front of a live crowd. Fittingly, given its focus on artits, the film takes place in the orbit of the protagonists with little shown of the world at large. Everything is dingy and grimey, hinting things aren't going swimmingly, and there are vaugue hints at ecological disaster but the characters are all far mor...

Ghostbusted

  Ghostbusters : Frozen Empire continues the trend of diminishing returns from Ghostbusters as a franchise. Worse, it's the first time  a 'Busters film has fallen into outright bad territory. After the classic 1984 original 1989's sequel was considered a disappointment (although it raked it in at the box office) but still had the charisma of its predecessors iconic cast. The female led reboot in 2016 was fun action comedy but didn't stand up the legendary original. In 2021 they started again with Afterlife, pitching Ghostbusters as Stranger Things in order to move things to a small town and test the water without having to bust the bank. Frozen Empire is a direct sequel to that film (and by extension the first two) but feels like little more than a corporate exercise in mud flinging to see what sticks. We start off with a ghost chase through New York, where Callie Spengler (Carrie Coon), her kids Trevor (Finn Wolfhard) and Phoebe (Mckenna Grace) and Gary Grooberson (Pa...

Smile for the Cameras

  The October horror train continues with Smile 2 , follow up to 2022 breakout hit Smile. Director and writer Parker J. Finn returns with a much more textured character story that is let down by retreading the same beats and half frights as its predecessor. After a brief segment involving Joel from the first movie we focus on pop star Sky Riley (Naomi Scott) as she attempts to mount a comeback a year on from a drug induced car crash that claimed the life of her boyfriend and left her needing extensive surgery. Unable to get strong painkillers due to her addiction problems she visits an old drug dealer friend to procure some Vicodin but when he smashes his own face in with a plate weight she inherits "The Smile" curse. She begins to experience bizarre goings on and people creepily grinning at her as she enters a race against time to discover what's going on and find a way to rid herself of the demon.  By far the strongest element of Smile 2 is the character of Sky and the...

Infinity Cruel

 Infinity Pool is first and foremost a critique of the kind of people who go to gated luxury resorts, the ones that have armed guards to keep away the impoverished locals. Therefore everyone here is disgusting. Uber handsome Alexander Skarsgard is a loser writer who spends most of the film sweating and dishevelled, Mia Goth goes from alluring to screeching alcaholic state, Thomas Kretchmann's local detective hates the entitled holiday makers but is happy to enable their explotation of his countrymen for financial gain. Pretty much everyone is morally bankrupt. This does create the slight problem of having nobody to get behind but that isn't really the point and this isn't the place you would find heroes. The plot revolves around an outrageous piece of (maybe) technology unique to the unamed country the film is set in. How a seemingly underdeveloped land came to posses such a thing is never really explored and neither are the ramifications of its existence beyond how they pe...

Guns and Cardio

The Running Man is a remake of the 1987's Arnold Schwarzenegger vehicle. Except it isn't really. It's actually a different, far more faithful, interpretation of the Stephen King story. That said, it's exactly what you would expect from a modern adaptation of an '80s cult classic; slicker, with more emphasis on the message, but much less personality and therefore destined to be forgotten far quicker. Written under the pseudonym Richard Bachman, King's 1982 novel is set in a dystopian 2025 where "The Network" is not just in charge of TV, but essentially run the United States and have turned the country into an authoritarian surveillance state where a small percentage of people are uber-wealthy, and everyone else struggles to afford even basic medicine. The film does away with the year, since the idea of people living like that in 2025 is so ridiculous.  Enter Glenn Powell as family man Ben Richards. He may live in a hellscape but old Ben doesn't do ...