Skip to main content

What is it Good For?


Warfare is a harrowing ninety-five minute peak into, well, warfare. Writer and co-director Ray Mendoza is a former Navy SEAL who now works as a Hollywood military advisor. During their work together on last year's "Civil War", he and Alex Garland (who also directs here) came up with the idea of showing audiences an ultra real slice of modern war without any of the movie trappings that make such scenes more digestible to viewers. This is that film and it's as uncomfortable as you would expect.

The events depicted took place in 2006 when Mendoza's unit came under attack while occupying two apartments in Ramadi, Iraq. We open with the soldiers watching the music video to Eric Prydz's "Call On Me" (the only music in the film) before we see them break into a family home and commandeer it to provide support for a group of Marines in the area. After that we are pretty much in real time as hostile locals gather and launch an attack. 

Everything we see and hear is based on memory, every line of dialogue is something the soldiers remember being said and all the events are shown exactly as recalled. |n that regard we are watching a memory of war rather than a documentary style dispassionate view. We still get expressionist flourishes such as the deadening of sound after an explosion and images of innocuous parts of the home that stuck in the memory. What we don't get are any of the musical or visual cues that normally accompany this type of action.  Someone standing in front of a door talking about how everything will work out means it's about to kick off right? No, instead a grenade might just pop through a window at any time. When someone becomes horrifically injured we are conditioned to wait for an end to his suffering, for him to die, pass out or be healed. Instead, his agonised screams become background noise for the rest of the film. This approach means the tension does not subside for a second, making for an impactful and stressful watch. What really puts it over the edge are the incredibly naturalistic performances. A very recognisable cast, including the likes of Will Poulter, Joseph Quinn and Kit Conner, completely disappear into their roles and it really is like watching real people under pressure. These aren't the no nonsense killing machines of your jingoistic Hollywood movies. There is bravery on display for sure, but there is also fear, panic and struggles to keep it together. Everyone reacts differently and everyone is trying to survive. When things are this grim, even for the side with an overwhelming arms advantage, it's hard to believe human beings are still doing this to each other in the 21st century.

Searing and stomach churning spectacle that it is, the film has its limitations. It is certainly no fluff piece, with their disregard for families who's home they have taken over and use of their local Iraqi helpers as glorified human shields, there is no attempt to make the US forces look like the good guys. However, the nature of the film means we only get one point of view and there is no discussion given to the wider events. Whether that lack of context affects its worth or impact is a matter of opinion and will vary from person to person. What is definitely jarring  is the ending. We finish with behind the scenes footage of the movie being made and a message from Mendoza thanking his SEAL team. It makes sense he would want to pay tribute but the tone is jovial and diminishes the impact of what would have been perfect final scenes that came just before. Separating the montage from the body of the film, either by making it a mid credits roll or playing over the credits, would have done wonders. 

It could be argued that we don't need another American view of conflict in Iraq but you've never seen one like this. As a feat of film making and a window into the nightmare that is armed conflict, Warfare is peerless. Be prepared for something you endure, not enjoy.

8 sledgehammered walls out of 10.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Won't Somebody Think of the Children

  Weapons is the sophomore effort from writer/director Zach Craggier and while his first film, "Barbarian", was well received, this feels like a clear step up. The film's fantastically eerie marketing campaign revolved around the movies central mystery, at 2.17 AM an entire classrooms worth of sixth graders get up out of bed and disappear into the night. It's a great hook but the story proper actually picks up a couple of months after the event and unfolds over a couple of days as the townspeople continue to deal with the fallout. The point of view shifts between a bunch of characters and time and space is given to fleshing out the small town details. This approach, combined with the sombre and eventually horrific goings on, gives the story a very Stephen King feel. It also works as a tension release, wiping the slate somewhat clean every time we switch perspective. The slight downside to the condensed mini series approach is that it lengthens the film with some segm...

Toxic Shock

  The Toxic Avenger ambles his way into theatres some two years after the film was first shown at festivals.  Strange that the movie had so much trouble finding a distributor given the presence of major names, relatively mainstream sensibilities (compared to the 80s original anyway) and the fact it's actually quite a bit of fun. Events take place in a fictional city inside a cartoonish, ultra-capitalist, crime-ridden caricature of 80s America, with locations called things like "Depressing Outskirts" and "Ye Olde Shithead District". Peter Dinklage is down on his luck janitor Winston Gooze, a widower with a step son who attempts to break into the headquarters of the mega-pharmaceutical company he works for when he discovers his gold level insurance doesn't cover treatment for his brain condition. Things go south and he is transformed into The Toxic Avenger, a mutated super human who sets about righting some wrongs in his crime ridden city. The film attempts t...

Dressed for Fun

The Naked Gun is a legacy sequel to the mad cap comedy franchise of the late 80's/ early 90's, with Liam Neeson playing Frank Drebin Jr, son of the legendary Leslie Neilson's detective from the original movies. Is big Liam quite as good at deadpan hilarity as Neilson was? Possibly not. Does this film ever completely match the highs of its predecessors? Probably not. Is it still very funny? Absolutely.  The film arrives amid a cinematic landscape devoid of out of and out comedies, with laughs mostly relegated to one liners in action films or the silly sidekick in a romcom. Fortunately, from the moment a Girl Scout peels off her face to reveal a gurning Neilson, right through to a joke filled credits roll, The Naked Gun is interested solely in making you chuckle. Sure, there is a plot, involving a mcguffin literally named PLOT device and an evil tech mogul, played with deliciously deadpan malice by Danny Huston, but it's all about the gags. The comedy runs the gamut from ...

We are Living in a Material World

 Materialists is, on the surface, a romantic drama-comedy about a New York matchmaker who faces a choice in her own love life. It has something more on its mind though, presenting a forensic examination of modern adult relationships and the incompatibility of expectation and genuine feeling.  Dakota Johnson is Lucy, a specialist in matching together "elite" couples. For elite, read some of the worst people on Earth. Men who demand their partners have knockout bodies, adhere to strict weight limits and the younger the better. Women who will only consider the tall, rich and in one case, white. In Lucy's world marriage is a business deal and the ultimate match is the one who checks the most boxes. As a "voluntary celibate", she carries this philosophy into here every day life and has no interest in dating until she can find the rich man who will make husband material. The love cynic is a classic trope for the lead in a movie with this set up but there is much more...

Best Foot 4Ward

The Fantastic Four : First Steps marks the third cinematic imagining of the first family of superheroes (not counting the unreleased Roger Corman movie of the 90's) and their introduction to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Well, sort of. It's sort of because the story takes place in a separate dimension from the rest of the films. This is Earth-828, where the Fantastic Four are seemingly the only super heroes. More than heroes, in fact, they are the de facto most important people on the planet and via science and diplomacy they have ushered in an era of worldwide peace and unity. The world itself is a fantastically realised retro-futuristic version of the 1960's, something like Fallout crossed with the Jetsons or, closer to home, a live action Incredibles. The Four consists of; Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal),  brilliant scientist with stretchy powers, his wife Sue Storm (Vanessa Kirby), who can go invisible and create force fields with her mind, her brother Johnny (Joseph Qui...

I Got Bombs But I'm Not a Bomber

 Oppenheimer posed a tricky question for perennial hit maker Christopher Nolan. How do you make a three hour biopic of a scientist compelling enough to bring in big money? Turns out the answer is to not make a biopic at all. While J. Robert Oppenheimer is indeed the focus of the film it eschews any traditional biopic format, instead serving up what is essentially a heist or even sports movie wrapped up in a courtroom drama. This allows the director to indulge his favourite hobby of playing with time, as the story jumps between two different panel hearings  while also covering Oppenheimer's early career and of course the work of the Manhattan Project. This approach works incredibly well with the three hour runtime flying by. In fact, if you go to see this in the cinema you might want to skip the large cola as there really isn't any time when little enough is happening to sneak in a toilet brake.  Technically the film is outstanding. Cinematographer Hoyte van Hoytema, follo...

The Menu Serves up a Macabre Treat

 The menu is a squid ink black culinary satire that skewers the sycophants and disrespectful tourists that steal the joy from being a high end chef (or any form of artist) while also being a three Michelin star dark comedy and acting as a power fantasy of sorts for those in the service industry. The film centres around Anya Taylor-Joy's Margot as she accompanies potential boyfriend Tyler (Nicholas Hoult) to an island to eat at the most exclusive of restraunts. The restraunt, and indeed whole island, are presided over by Chef Slowik who is idolised by his diners and inspires complete devotion from his cult-like staff. The customers comprise the worst, but all too familiar, "enjoyers" of fine dining. There's a hilariously self-indulgent critic, some wall street bro's there for the bragging rights, a washed up, name dropping celebrity and an ultra rich couple with no appreciation for the privilege they enjoy. Perhaps most ridiculous of all is Tyler himself, a gate ke...

Summer of Discontent

  Unlike say, Final Destination, I Know What You Did Last Summer is not an idea ripe for remakes and sequels. Once you've told the story of a group of people leaving someone for dead, only to be hunted down a year later in grizzly revenge, there isn't really anywhere else to go while sticking close enough to the formulae to warrant being a successor. Its not a major surprise then that this sequel to the 1997 movie of the same name does little more than tread most of the same water as its precursor while trying to reference and acknowledge the original at every opportunity.  This time round, the central cast are a little older than the high school graduates of 97 but still act like teenagers. Some of the clunkiest exposition dialogue of recent memory attempts to fill out their back stories but you're left with a group of characters you can't wait to watch die. This would be fine if it wasn't for the fact that, for most of the runtime, the inept hook wielding killer ...

Sinnerma

The later trailers for Sinners give away a major plot point that will be discussed in this review. It isn't a spoiler as such, since its integral to the nature of the film and its hard to see how the movie could have been advertised without showing it, but if you haven't seen the marketing, simply go and watch this astonishing work of film making and come back later. If you've already seen it, or know what kind of film it is, read on.  To date, director Ryan Coogler's big screen credits are; true story "Fruitvale Station", Rocky franchise sequel "Creed" and two MCU movies ("Black Panther" and its sequel). If you've marvelled at how he has managed to infuse those franchise movies with both deeply personal meaning and wide cultural themes, and wondered what he could achieve with a project that is purely his own, then Sinners is your answer and it is glorious. In a rare studio win, Warner Brothers deserve credit for funding a wholly origi...

The Game is Rigged

  The Blackening begins like a cross between Scream and Saw, with a couple getting offed after being made to "play a game". Said game being an offensively racist board game that gives the movie it's title.  After this set up we are introduced to the various characters of the film who are getting together to mark the anniversary of finishing college. The relationships between the group are more complicated than you usually encounter in a slasher film and their dynamics helps flesh out the story.  Said story consists of the group playing the game and fighting off slashers. This, it turns out, is a lot easier when you make logical decisions rather than indulge in the clueless floundering you usually see in movies with this set up. The protagonists actually being pro active is one of the many meta black culture jokes running through the film. Other examples include the group being asked to name a horror film where the black character survives and told to decide which of them ...